When buying a business, it is crucial to identify what is being purchased and the structure of the transaction. When buying a business, the two primary types of transactions are an equity purchase and an asset purchase. Each method has distinct implications for the buyer and the seller, especially regarding tax treatment, liability, and the structure of the transaction. Here’s a detailed comparison of the two:
1. Definition
- Equity Purchase: In an equity purchase, the buyer acquires the ownership interest (equity) in the business, such as shares or membership interests, of the target company. The buyer becomes the new owner of the entire company, including all assets and liabilities.
- Asset Purchase: In an asset purchase, the buyer purchases specific assets (and possibly liabilities) of the business, but not the entire company itself. The buyer may choose which assets to acquire, such as property, equipment, intellectual property, inventory, contracts, and goodwill, and typically leaves behind unwanted liabilities.
2. What is Acquired?
- Equity Purchase:
- The buyer acquires ownership of the company (e.g., shares or membership interests in the business).
- The buyer indirectly takes control of all assets and liabilities of the business, including things like contracts, debts, pending lawsuits, and other obligations.
- Asset Purchase:
- The buyer only acquires specific assets and liabilities that are agreed upon in the transaction.
- The buyer does not automatically inherit all of the company’s existing obligations or liabilities, unless specifically agreed to (e.g., assuming certain debts or liabilities).
3. Liability
- Equity Purchase:
- The buyer inherits the company’s liabilities, both known and unknown (such as existing debt, lawsuits, or environmental liabilities).
- Personal liability could be an issue if there are contingent liabilities or undisclosed issues that become apparent after the purchase.
- Asset Purchase:
- The buyer does not automatically assume the company’s liabilities unless they specifically agree to do so (e.g., assuming certain debts or liabilities).
- The buyer can avoid unwanted risks by carefully selecting which assets and liabilities to take on, potentially leaving the seller with certain debts or obligations.
4. Tax Implications
- Equity Purchase:
- For the seller: In an equity purchase, the seller typically faces capital gains tax on the sale of their ownership interest. The tax rate will depend on whether the seller qualifies for long-term capital gains treatment.
- For the buyer: The buyer inherits the historical tax basis of the company’s assets, which could result in less favorable depreciation and amortization deductions in the future. This is because the buyer essentially “steps into the shoes” of the seller in terms of tax treatment.
- Asset Purchase:
- For the seller: The seller may face higher taxes on an asset sale because the sale of individual assets (such as equipment or real estate) may trigger ordinary income taxes (for assets like inventory or intellectual property) or capital gains taxes (for assets like real estate or goodwill).
- For the buyer: The buyer generally gets the step-up in basis on the assets they acquire, meaning they can take a higher depreciation deduction based on the purchase price. This can be beneficial for the buyer, as it reduces future taxable income.
5. Contractual Considerations
- Equity Purchase:
- The buyer generally inherits the company’s contracts, including leases, agreements with customers, suppliers, and employees. This may require consent or assignment from third parties in some cases, especially if the contracts have change-of-control provisions.
- Asset Purchase:
- The buyer typically needs to negotiate and obtain assignments or consents for key contracts, such as leases or customer agreements, since the company itself is not being transferred.
- The buyer can avoid contracts they don’t want, and not assume all liabilities, which provides greater flexibility in structuring the deal.
6. Buyer’s Control Over Existing Issues
- Equity Purchase:
- The buyer may inherit existing legal, tax, or environmental issues, such as lawsuits, tax audits, or other disputes that are tied to the company itself.
- Due diligence is critical in an equity purchase to identify any hidden issues, and buyers often require representations and warranties from the seller to address potential risks.
- Asset Purchase:
- The buyer has more control over what liabilities or issues they take on, as they can exclude unwanted assets or liabilities from the deal.
- However, even in an asset purchase, certain liabilities (e.g., those that cannot be avoided by law) may still be transferred, so the buyer must conduct thorough due diligence.
7. Structuring the Deal
- Equity Purchase:
- The transaction is simpler because it only involves the purchase of ownership interests (e.g., shares or membership units).
- The buyer takes control of the company as a whole and doesn’t need to go through the process of transferring individual assets.
- Asset Purchase:
- The deal is generally more complex because it involves identifying, valuing, and transferring individual assets (e.g., real estate, equipment, intellectual property, etc.).
- The buyer may need to go through the process of transferring titles, deeds, intellectual property rights, or reassigning contracts, which can increase transaction time and costs.
8. Impact on Employees
- Equity Purchase:
- The company’s employment contracts and other employee-related obligations remain unchanged after the transaction.
- Employees generally continue working for the business under the same terms and conditions unless the buyer chooses to change them.
- Asset Purchase:
- The buyer may hire employees on new terms and is not automatically bound by existing employment contracts or obligations (such as pensions, severance, etc.), unless the buyer assumes those liabilities.
- The seller might have to terminate employees before the asset sale, and the buyer may then rehire them.
9. Ease of Financing
- Equity Purchase:
- Financing can be easier for the buyer in some cases because they are acquiring the whole company, which includes the company’s ongoing operations, customer base, and contracts.
- Lenders may view equity purchases more favorably since the buyer is acquiring a fully operational business with established relationships and assets.
- Asset Purchase:
- Financing an asset purchase can be more difficult because the buyer may only be acquiring certain assets, which could make the business less appealing to lenders.
- However, the buyer may also be able to secure financing based on the value of the specific assets being purchased (such as equipment, real estate, or intellectual property).
SUMMARY OF KEY DIFFERENCES
Aspect | Equity Purchase | Asset Purchase |
What is Acquired? | The entire company, including all assets and liabilities. | Specific assets and liabilities (not the whole company). |
Liability | Buyer inherits all liabilities (both known and unknown). | Buyer typically avoids inheriting unwanted liabilities. |
Tax Treatment (Buyer) | Inherits tax basis of company’s assets (less favorable for depreciation). | Buyer gets a step-up in basis, enabling better depreciation deductions. |
Tax Treatment (Seller) | Seller faces capital gains tax on the sale of their shares. | Seller may face ordinary income tax and capital gains tax on the sale of assets. |
Contractual Considerations | Inherits contracts and agreements. | Must negotiate assignments or consents for key contracts. |
Complexity | Simpler, as only ownership interest is transferred. | More complex due to asset identification, valuation, and transfer process. |
Employee Issues | Employees continue under the same terms. | Employees may need to be rehired under new terms. |
Which Option is Better?
- Equity Purchase: Generally preferred by sellers because it’s simpler and often results in better tax treatment (capital gains on the sale of stock). It’s also favorable for a buyer looking to acquire the entire business, including its contracts, licenses, and ongoing operations.
- Asset Purchase: Typically preferred by buyers because it allows them to selectively choose the assets and liabilities they want to acquire, limiting risk and providing tax benefits (step-up in asset basis). However, it’s more complex and can take longer to finalize.
Both options require careful consideration of tax, legal, and business factors, and it’s crucial for both buyers and sellers to work with qualified advisors (attorneys, accountants) to choose the right structure for their needs. Roberts Law, PLLC is happy to assist with your transaction whether it is the purchase or sale of a Florida business or its assets. Contact us if you need more information or assistance.
Author: Kelly Roberts
Kelly Roberts is a business and bankruptcy attorney at Roberts Law, PLLC. She has over a decade of experience assisting businesses and business owners navigate contracts, partnership structures, negotiations, and dispute resolution. Kelly earned her Juris Doctorate from the University of Miami School of Law.
Disclaimer: The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction or the jurisdiction applicable to your issue/matter. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Roberts Law, PLLC or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.